During 2019, Pepe Guardio purchases the following property for use in his calendar year-end manufacturing business: Item Date Acquired Cost
Manufacturing equipment (7 year) June 2 $40,000
Office furniture September 15 $6,000
Office computer November 18 $2,000
Passenger automobile
(used 90 percent for business) May 31 $54,000
Warehouse June 23
Building $165,000
Land $135,000
Pepe uses the accelerated depreciation method under MACRS, if available, and does not make the election to expense or take a bonus depreciation. Use Form 4562 to report Pepe's depreciation expense for 2019.
Enter all amounts as positive numbers. If required, round to the nearest dollar. If an amount is zero, enter "0."

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.