Think about a financial decision you made regarding the purchase of a big-ticket item or investment within the last five years. Provide a summary on the discussion thread, answering the following questions:What decision did you make?How prepared were you to make the decision?What was your thought process as you were making the decision?What financial information did you need to make the decision and why?What lessons have you learned that you will apply to future financial decisions?

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.