Record journal entries for the following separate transactions. a. Max Inc. issued 6,000 shares of $1 par value common stock for $20 per share on January 1, 2020.
b. Max Inc. issued 1,200 shares of no-par common stock for $25 per share on January 1, 2020. The state of incorporation requires a minimum value per share of $2.
c. Max Inc. issued 600 shares of no-par common stock for $18 per share on January 1, 2020.
d. Max Inc. issued 6,000 shares of $1 par value common stock for $18 per share on January 1, 2020, and incurred $1,200 in legal fees related to the stock issuance.
e. Max Inc. issued 12,000 shares of common stock ($1 par) in exchange for equipment with a fair value of $213,600.
f. Max Inc. issued 3,600 shares of Class A common stock ($1 par) and 4,800 shares of Class B common stock ($2 par) at a price of $96,000. At the time of issuance, the market price of the Class A common stock is $15 per share, and the market price of the Class B common stock is $10 per share.
g. Max Inc. issued 3,600 shares of Class A common stock ($1 par) and 4,800 shares of Class B common stock ($2 par) at a price of $102,000. At the time of issuance, the market price of the Class A common stock is $16 per share, and the market price of the Class B common stock is unknown.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.