A manufacturer marketed a new mascara that initial testing revealed could cause an allergic reaction in a small number of people. One of the people found to have this allergic reaction in initial testing suffered significant loss of vision in one eye as a result. When the mascara was released on the market, the manufacturer included a warning of the possibility of an allergic reaction, but did not provide the consumer with any way to test for the allergy and made no mention of the possibility of this allergic reaction causing loss of vision. Joan purchased the new mascara from a local drug store and suffered an allergic reaction to the mascara that caused a 90% loss of vision in her right eye. How strong of a case does Joan have against the manufacturer for strict product liability

At april 1, 2019, the food and drug administration is in the process of investigating allegations of false marketing claims by hulkly muscle supplements. the fda has not yet proposed a penalty assessment. hulkly’s fiscal year ends on december 31, 2018. the company’s financial statements are issued in april 2019. required: for each of the following scenarios, determine the appropriate way to report the situation. 1. management feels an assessment is reasonably possible, and if an assessment is made an unfavorable settlement of $13 million is reasonably possible. 2. management feels an assessment is reasonably possible, and if an assessment is made an unfavorable settlement of $13 million is probable. 3. management feels an assessment is probable, and if an assessment is made an unfavorable settlement of $13 million is reasonably possible. 4. management feels an assessment is probable, and if an assessment is made an unfavorable settlement of $13 million is probable.