Organizations spend a lot of money enabling employees to solve problems collectively. But inducing more collaboration may actually hinder the most important part of problem-solving: actually solving the problem. Should the organizations let their employees do work individually?

There are positive and negative risks to every new strategy implemented in an organization. In the case of giving more independence to employees by letting them work individually, the company can indeed have positive results, such as increased individual productivity of employees, reduction of conflicts, greater innovation and problem solving.

But before implementing any strategy, the company must consider its structure, objectives and values, and then carry out an analytical plan that makes it possible to understand if this is a positive strategy, as there are businesses that need collective work so that they can be developed effectively .

answer with step-by-step explanation:

a. wx is perpendicular to xy - true:

(since x is adjacent to x and y and all angles are 90 degrees in a square, therefore wx is perpendicular to xy)

b. ∠w is congruent to ∠x - true:

(all angles in a square are equal to each other)

c. ∠w is supplementary to ∠x - true:

(∠w and ∠x both are right angles which add up to 180 degrees so they are supplementary angles)

d. wxyz is a rhombus - true:

(a rhombus has all sides equal in length and so has a square so it is a rhombus)

e. wxyz is a trapezoid - false:

(a trapezoid has only one pair of parallel sides while a square has two pairs of parallel sides)

f. wx is parallel to yz - true:

(wx and yz are parallel to each other)

answer; /// blank(1); increases; blank(2); decreases;