After becoming the impressive champions of World Cup, U. S. Women National Soccer Team is set to start a Victory Tour that will take place in August. Within the Tour, the team will play 3 friendly games (one in TX, one in NY, one in CA). For the game in TX, Soccer Federation is anticipating a demand for the tickets by the following distribution, with P(·) being the probability distribution. Number of Supporters P(Number of Supporters)
12000 0.1
15000 0.25
18000 0.4
21000 0.2
24000 0.05

The Federation must decide in which stadium the game will take place at, and they want to make this selection in a way that it maximizes their expected profit. Ticket price is $18 a seat and ticket printing cost is $4 a ticket. If the Federation has to pay additional $2 for each unsold ticket, which one of the following stadiums they should choose to play the game at?

a. Mike A. Myers Stadium, Austin (capacity = 20000)
b. Toyota Stadium, Frisco (capacity = 22000)
c. BBVA Stadium, Houston (capacity = 19000)
d. Pennington Stadium, Bedford (capacity = 17000)

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?