subject
Business, 17.08.2021 14:00 edgartorres5123

Imagine you have K 6.5 million at your disposal to invest in your various options of investments. However you have no indication on how to effectively go about it and accordingly make a quality decision, but you have some indistinct ideas. One option available to you is to build a block of flats or invest this lump sum in undisclosed type of investments. You are also privy to the fact that building flats will yield the same returns if you invested in these other unrevealed investment options available over same life span [you will need to mention them in (d)]. Assuming in the economy you are domiciled in, the prevailing interest rates are pegged at 35 percent and to complete a block of flats it will take you 3 years, of which inflation is at 25 percent. Further you should note that other factors of investment are only varied in long run to increase your available lump sum of investment, which may be constrained by the rising inflation as time rolls on.

REQUIRED
a) Calculate the net present value of your investment sum over the 3 year time horizon?

b) What principle would be relevant to the understanding of variation of factors of investment in the SR and LR?

c) Further, by applying relevant managerial principles (which you should mention here) to surmount this conflict show why it would be rational to invest in other investment options other than building flats to resolve this investment choice problem you are confronted with?

d) From your calculations and knowledge of managerial principles, mention the type of instruments of investment you would have used here to invest your money, other than building flats, if you had adequately evaluated your investment options?

e) Based on your computations and comparisons which investment option is more technically viable and appealing, further state the managerial principle you would apply to make effective and quality decision for this, based on time horizon, give reasons for your answer?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Rossdale co. stock currently sells for $68.91 per share and has a beta of 0.88. the market risk premium is 7.10 percent and the risk-free rate is 2.91 percent annually. the company just paid a dividend of $3.57 per share, which it has pledged to increase at an annual rate of 3.25 percent indefinitely. what is your best estimate of the company's cost of equity?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Can someone me ? i’ll mark the best answer brainliest : )
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20
Tl & co. is following a related-linked diversification strategy, and soar inc. is following a related-constrained diversification strategy. how do the two firms differ from each other? a. soar inc. generates 70 percent of its revenues from its primary business, while tl & co. generates only 10 percent of its revenues from its primary business. b. soar inc. pursues a backward diversification strategy, while tl & co. pursues a forward diversification strategy. c. tl & co. will share fewer common competencies and resources between its various businesses when compared to soar inc. d. tl & co. pursues a differentiation strategy, and soar inc. pursues a cost-leadership strategy, to gain a competitive advantage.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Imagine you have K 6.5 million at your disposal to invest in your various options of investments. Ho...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.11.2020 08:20
question
Chemistry, 16.11.2020 08:20
question
Chemistry, 16.11.2020 08:20
question
Mathematics, 16.11.2020 08:20
Questions on the website: 13722361