Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 02:00
On january 1, 2017, fisher corporation purchased 40 percent (90,000 shares) of the common stock of bowden, inc. for $980,000 in cash and began to use the equity method for the investment. the price paid represented a $48,000 payment in excess of the book value of fisher's share of bowden's underlying net assets. fisher was willing to make this extra payment because of a recently developed patent held by bowden with a 15-year remaining life. all other assets were considered appropriately valued on bowden's books. bowden declares and pays a $90,000 cash dividend to its stockholders each year on september 15. bowden reported net income of $400,000 in 2017 and $348,000 in 2018. each income figure was earned evenly throughout its respective year. on july 1, 2018, fisher sold 10 percent (22,500 shares) of bowden's outstanding shares for $338,000 in cash. although it sold this interest, fisher maintained the ability to significantly influence bowden's decision-making process. prepare the journal entries for fisher for the years of 2017 and 2018. (if no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "no journal entry required" in the first account field. do not round intermediate calculations. round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar.)
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 13:40
Determine if the following statements are true or false. an increase in government spending can crowd out private investment. an improvement in the budget balance increases the demand for financial capital. an increase in private consumption may crowd out private investment. lower interest rates can lead to private investment being crowded out. a trade balance in sur+ increases the supply of financial capital. if private savings is equal to private investment, then there is neither a budget sur+ nor a budget deficit.
Answers: 1
Business, 23.06.2019 08:00
Which of the following is a benefit of a hat? it has a sports team logo on it. it makes the wearer look cool. it is red. it costs $12.
Answers: 2
Business, 23.06.2019 20:00
What could explain why a decrease in taxes could lead to a less-than-proportionate increase in output? a. as a result of diminishing returns to current consumption, consumers may choose to spread the extra spending over the long term rather than consuming the proceeds of a tax cut all at once. b. consumers may choose to save much of the tax cut in anticipation of having to pay higher taxes in the future. c. a decrease in taxes will necessitate lower government outlays, thus largely offsetting the higher consumption expenditures of households. d. all of the above. e. a and b only.
Answers: 3
Which of the following might affect financial aid eligibility if money is withdrawn from it? (5 poin...
Mathematics, 21.06.2021 03:40
Chemistry, 21.06.2021 03:40
World Languages, 21.06.2021 03:40
Mathematics, 21.06.2021 03:40
Mathematics, 21.06.2021 03:50
Social Studies, 21.06.2021 03:50
Mathematics, 21.06.2021 03:50
Social Studies, 21.06.2021 03:50