You have just sold a condo that you own in Las Vegas Nevada in return for some cash and property on Lake Tahoe which includes a cabin. What is the Amount Realized the Sale, your Adjusted Basis; and, your Gain or Loss Realized and Recognized. You paid 400,000 for a two-bedroom condo in Las Vegas on the Strip and over the past 10 years you have used it for rental property and claimed 65,000 for depreciation. You made 40,000 in Capital Improvements in the condo in Las Vegas. You owe approximately 120,000 on the condo and the buyer assumed the mortgage for you. The cost of the sale was 50,000 which was deducted at closing. The person who bought the condo paid you 200,000 in cash and the Cabin in Lake Tahoe is worth 300,000 fair market value. He has a mortgage on this property totaling 50,000 which you have assumed.

Ajustification for job training programs is that they improve worker productivity. suppose that you are asked to evaluate whether more job training makes workers more productive. however, rather than having data on individual workers, you have access to data on manufacturing firms in ohio. in particu- lar, for each firm, you have information on hours of job training per worker (training) and number of nondefective items produced per worker hour (output). (i) carefully state the ceteris paribus thought experiment underlying this policy question. (ii) does it seem likely that a firm’s decision to train its workers will be independent of worker characteristics? what are some of those measurable and unmeasurable worker characteristics? (iii) name a factor other than worker characteristics that can affect worker productivity. (iv) if you find a positive correlation between output and training, would you have convincingly established that job training makes workers more productive? explain.

1. the political environment in india has proven to be critical to company performance for both pepsico and coca-cola india. what specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? if not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. timing of entry into the indian market brought different results for pepsico and coca-cola india. what benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? 3. the indian market is enormous in terms of population and geography. how have the two companies responded to the sheer scale of operations in india in terms of product policies, promotional activities, pricing policies, and distribution arrangements? 4. “global localization” (glocalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. give examples for each company from the case.

Uknow what i love about i ask a dumb question it is immediately answered but when i ask a real question it take like an hour to get answered