For a closed economy, GDP is $13 trillion, consumption is $9 trillion, taxes are $4 trillion and the government runs a surplus of $1 trillion. What is national saving? a.$1 trillion
b.$5 trillion
c.$2 trillion
d.$3 trillion

In the economy of Russia in 2020, consumption was $3500, exports were $200, GDP was $7200, government purchases were $2500, and investment was $2,000. What were Russia’s imports in 2020?
a.$14,400
b.$800
c.$8200
d.$1,000

Suppose that in a closed economy GDP is equal to 10,000, taxes are equal to 3,500 consumption equals 6,000 and government purchases equal 2,000. What are private saving, public saving, and national saving?
a.2,500, 1,000, and 1,500, respectively
b.2,000, 2,000, and 1,500, respectively
c.2,000, 500, and 1,500, respectively

Pear co.’s income statement for the year ended december 31, as prepared by pear’s controller, reported income before taxes of $125,000. the auditor questioned the following amounts that had been included in income before taxes: equity in earnings of cinn co. $ 40,000 dividends received from cinn 8,000 adjustments to profits of prior years for arithmetical errors in depreciation (35,000) pear owns 40% of cinn’s common stock, and no acquisition differentials are relevant. pear’s december 31 income statement should report income before taxes of

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

Amanufacturer has paid an engineering firm $200,000 to design a new plant, and it will cost another $2 million to build the plant. in the meantime, however, the manufacturer has learned of a foreign company that offers to build an equivalent plant for $2,100,000. what should the manufacturer do?