A company has two divisionsan upstream division that makes an intermediate product and a downstream division that uses the intermediate product as an input in the production of the firm's final product. If there is no outside market for the intermediate product, what transfer price for the intermediate product will maximize the company's overall profit? A. The transfer price should be set below the marginal cost of producing the intermediate product in order to give the downstream division a cost advantage when producing the final product.
B. The transfer price should be set to maximize the upstream division's profit. Then, when the downstream division buys the intermediate product and maximizes its profit, the company's overall profit will be maximized.
C. The transfer price should be set equal to the marginal cost of producing the intermediate product.
D. The transfer price is not important since it is just an internal price. The only effect the transfer price has is to divide the company's profits between the two divisions. The overall profit earned by the company is not affected.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.