text written for advertising and marketing campaigns is referred to asa context  b content  c copy  d collateral

The chart shows a production possibilities schedule for sabrina’s soccer. combination: soccer balls: soccer nets: a 10 0 b 8 1 c 6 2 d 4 3 e 2 4 f 0 5 which statement correctly explains the chart? a. the opportunity cost of producing one soccer net is eight soccer balls. b. the opportunity cost of producing two soccer nets is two soccer balls. c. the opportunity cost of producing two soccer balls is one soccer net. d. the opportunity cost of producing four soccer balls is three soccer nets.

There are about 6.8 billion people in the world, and about 11.4 billion usable hectares. currently, the population of the united states has an ecological footprint of about 9.0 hectares per person. if all people in the world were to live at the level of consumption found in the united states, the population of the world would have to in order to support them.

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?