Which of the following is not a way in which carbon sequestration can benefit soil?
a. decreased erosion
b. increased water quality
c. increased water storage
d. increased soil quality

Decreased erosion is not a route in which carbon sequestration can profit soil. The right choice among every one of the choices given in the inquiry is alternative "a". Carbon emanation can be lessened by decreasing outflows from farming and different sources and putting away the carbon in soils and plant biomass.

Carbon sequestriation is the process of removing carbon from the atmosphere and storing it, either in solid or liquid form. In agriculture, carbon sequestriation takes two forms: reducing emissions and enhancing removal. One goal is to use the soil to sequester the carbon released by crops as part of their natural place in the carbon cycle. This can have positive effects on water and soil quality, but does not particurlarly effect erosion. A is the correct answer.