Which of the following statements is false?
a. chemical reactions proceed more quickly at higher temperatures.
b. chemical reactions progress at a faster rate when the reacting particles are present in higher numbers. catalysts increase the rate of chemical reactions, sometimes while undergoing reversible changes in shape. larger particles move faster than smaller ones and thus collide more frequently and more forcefully.

Larger particles move faster than smaller ones and thus collide more frequently and more forcefully.

Explanation:

SMALER particles move faster than LARGER ones and thus collide more frequently and more forcefully.

The false statement is B.

Explanation:

When the temperature in a reaction increases, the rate of this reaction increases.

It means that it would be more probably to each molecule in the system collides but that does not mean that the reaction will happen faster because there is other factors that affect the velocity of the reaction, such as concentration of reactants, presence of catalyst, and activation energy.

Also, the nature itself of the reaction can affect the velocity, due to some of chemistry reactions occur instantaneously without increasing the temperature and in the case you increase the temperature the reaction will not occur quickly.

On the other hand, the size of the particle will affect the rate due to smaller particles are able to move faster than larger ones under high Temperature.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

l dont know l am s sorry