subject
Chemistry, 20.09.2019 22:10 hokamidat

Aliquid mixture containing ethanol (55.0 wt%) and the balance water enters a separation process unit at a rate of 90.5 kg/s. a technician draws samples of two product streams leaving the separator and analyzes them with a gas chromatograph, obtaining values of 86.2 wt% ethanol (product stream 1) and 10.9% ethanol (product stream 2). the technician then reads a manometer attached to an orifice meter mounted in the pipe carrying product stream 1, converts the reading to volumetric flow rate using a calibration curve, and converts that result to a mass flow rate using the average density of ethanol and water. the result is 54.0 kg/s. finally, the technician calculates the mass flow rate of the second product stream using a material balance and reports the calculated product stream flow rates and compositions to you. you examine them, do some calculations, and reject them.(a) draw and label a flow chart of the separation process.(b) carry out the calculations that led you to reject the submitted results and explain how you knew the values were wrong.(c) list up to five possible reasons for the incorrect results. for each one, briefly state how you might determine whether it was in fact a cause of error and what you might do to correct it if it was.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 13:00
Pauling and lewis questioned the extreme definitions of bonds. they wondered if bonds might be described somewhere in between the two extremes (covalent and ionic). on the basis of experimental data,pauling confirmed that bonds could be ionic, covalent, and for those, in between, exhibit a degree of ionic character. he theorized that the major factor was how strongly the atoms in the bond attracted the electrons. pauling called this factor - the tendency of an atom to attract electrons in a bond.
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 21:00
The earth's moon is unusually large. two popular theories of the moon's origin include the "sister world" hypothesis, which states that the moon formed from the same materials as the earth, near enough to the earth that they fell into orbit around each other. a second theory is the "capture" hypothesis, in which the moon formed elsewhere in the solar system, and the earth's gravity pulled it into its orbit. studies of what the moon is made of indicate that some of its materials had to come from the earth or from the same area of the solar system where the earth had formed. at the same time, the moon does not contain much of the material that makes up the earth's core, so the moon could not have formed from the same materials as the earth. how do the two facts above affect the described theories of the moon's origin? a. they show that scientists will never agree on where the moon came from. b. they show that more experiments on moon formation need to be done. c. they show that no theory accounts for the existence of the moon. d. they show that neither theory is complete and entirely correct.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 22:30
1. combine iron and copper (ii) sulfate solution. (hint: iron will form the iron (iii) ion) fe + cuso4 → 2. combine lead (ii) nitrate and potassium iodide solutions. pb(no3)2+ kl → 3. combine magnesium metal and hydrochloric acid solution. mg + hcl → 4. electrolysis (splitting) of water. h2o → 5. burning magnesium. mg + o2 →
Answers: 3
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 11:00
Hey can you me with this i really need y’all
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Aliquid mixture containing ethanol (55.0 wt%) and the balance water enters a separation process unit...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 25.06.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 25.06.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722359