After a polypeptide chain has been synthesized, certain amino acids in the peptide may become modified. for each modified amino acid, identify the standard amino acid from which it is derived. enter the unabbreviated name of the standard amino acid. the amino acid structure shows the fully ionized form. the side chain is c h 2, c h 2, c h (o h), c h 2, n h 3 (plus). standard amino acid: identify the modification that yields the first amino acid depicted.

The modification that yields the first amino acid depicted is lysine

Explanation:

Lysine being an amino acid used in preparation of various medicine. It is used to prevent cold as well as sore throat, which is found to be caused by the herpes simplex labialis. It can be used orally or can be directly applied over the skin. various foods have lysine in it and they are meat, cheese, certain fishes, eggs, soybeans, spirulina and also fenugreek seed. They are the building block for the protein particles.

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.