Will mark brainliest

Part Two—Quantum Numbers

Answer the questions on quantum numbers below. One example has been done for you. Example: What are the first two quantum numbers for the electrons located in subshell 2p? Energy level (n = 2), p subshell (l = 1)

4. What are the first two quantum numbers for the electrons located in subshell 4d?

5. What are the first three quantum numbers for the electrons located in subshell 2s?

6. How many electrons can be held in a sublevel l = 3?

7. How many electrons can be held in the energy level n = 4?

8. How many electrons in an atom can share the quantum numbers n = 4 and l = 3?

4. Principal and Azimuthal (subsidiary) quantum number

5.Principal, Azimuthal (subsidiary), and magnetic quantum number

6. 10 electrons

7. 32 electrons

8. 36 electrons

Explanation:

4. Principal and Azimuthal (subsidiary) quantum number because in 4d, 4 represent principal quantum number and d- represents azimuthal quantum number (having l- value as 3)

5.Principal, Azimuthal (subsidiary), and magnetic quantum number are the first three because 2 stands for principal, s-for azimuthal (l=0) and magnetic quantum number for s- orbital= 0

6. 10 electrons, because for sublevel with l= 3, is a d-sub-level, and d- can take 10-electrons

7. 32 electrons, using the relationship 2×n^2 for the maximum number of electrons in a shell,

,n= 4 , hence 2×4^2= 32

8. 36 electrons, because n=4 and n= 3 can have the maximum configuration of [Ar]4s^2 3d^10 4p^6

This will sum up to 36- electrons, since Argon has 18 -electrons.

18+2+10+6=36 electrons

is has three carbons, so the answer is propylamine.

meth-

eth-

prop-

but-

pent-

hex-

hept-

oct-

non-

explanation:

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation: