How did the Bohr model of the atom affect scientific thought

Bohr's atomic model is based on the fact that the nucleus is a positive center and that the helix contains negatively charged electrons.

The electrons are so that it was discovered that they rotate around the nucleus in a circular way, this phenomenon was not believed before this discovery.

Bhor's postulate corrupted with some thoughts that were believed in 1913, which were abolished.

Bohr's postulate presented three updates, so there was a first postulate, a second postulate, and a third postulate. That is why it is considered as a dynamic postulate in science.

Also in 1913 it was discovered that as the electron is further from the nucleus, that is to say in the lower orbits, the more potential energy this electron would have.

The movements of the electrons and their exit from orbit are associated with a release of energy, where it is determined what is this energy released in the form of a photon.

Explanation:

Some associated Bohr's postulate as a small solar system, that is, it associated the nucleus with the sun and the electron orbits with the planetary orbits.

Bohr's atomic model was the one that impelled the objective imagination of the shape of an atom, since little information or little association was obtained in science on the atomic structure.

This atomic model opened doors to other knowledge, and other chemical phenomena were better understood, such as chemical unions, the assignment of names or signs to orbits, chemical reactions, energy emissions, among others.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

so what is the problem with your lab report and whats the subject of the lab report? i will you