Someone tells you they've heard of a powder that, if worn a pouch around the neck, will cure a cold. This person claims that the powder has cured everyone
with a cold who has worn it. How do you explain to this person that, despite the
Positive results, this is pseudoscientific claim?*
Your answer
This is a required question

Not all reasoning is scientific nor should it be: (I’m allowed to be a Milwaukee Brewers fan even if good scientific reasoning - or good logical and critical thinking - might force me to acknowledge that the St Louis CardinaIs would be a more rewarding team to follow)

Some reasoning, though, passes itself off as scientific, hoping to gain the credibility of scientific reasoning without accepting the rigours and implication of the scientific method. This is pseudo – or ‘fake’ – science: non-scientific reasoning that masquerades as science in order to make its claims seem more robust or secure than they are in fact.

Explanation:

d.) the average kinetic energy of the gas particles is greater in container b because its particles move faster.

the volume increases