What did you include in your response? Check all that apply.
Sample Response: No, the resulting wave in the
diagram does not demonstrate destructive interference.
The resulting wave in the diagram shows a bigger wave
than Wave 1 or Wave 2. If it demonstrated destructive
interference, it would be a smaller wave or a horizontal
line. With destructive interference, waves break down to
form a smaller wave, or cancel each other out, resulting
in no wave formation.
The diagram of the resulting wave does not
demonstrate destructive interference.
With destructive interference, waves break each
other down to form a smaller wave, or cancel each
other out, resulting in no wave formation.
No wave formation is represented by a horizontal
line.

Why do you suppose the structural polysaccharide cellulose does not contain branches? why do you suppose the structural polysaccharide cellulose does not contain branches? branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into globules, thereby decreasing the flexibility and strength of the globules. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into microfibrils, thereby increasing the rigidity and strength of the microfibrils. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into globules, thereby increasing the flexibility and strength of the globules. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into microfibrils, thereby decreasing the rigidity and strength of the microfibrils.

How many liters of water vapor can be produced if 108 grams of methane gas (ch4) are combusted at 312 k and 0.98 atm? show all work. pls ! will mark as brainliest

How would you reduce the volume of gas