g is the maximum number of grams of ammonia, NH , which can be obtained from the reaction of 10.0 g of H and 80.0 g of N

56.67 g of NH₃.

Explanation:

We'll begin by writing the balanced equation for the reaction. This is given below:

N₂ + 3H₂ —> 2NH₃

Next, we shall determine the masses of N₂ and H₂ that reacted and the mass of NH₃ produced from the balanced equation. This is illustrated below:

Molar mass of N₂ = 14 × 2 = 28 g/mol

Mass of N₂ from the balanced equation = 1 × 28 = 28 g

Molar mass of H₂ = 1 × 2 = 2 g/mol

Mass of H₂ from the balanced equation = 3 × 2 = 6 g

Molar mass of NH₃ = 14 + (3×1) = 14 + 3 = 17 g/mol

Mass of NH₃ from the balanced equation = 2 × 17 = 34 g

SUMMARY:

From the balanced equation above,

28 g of N₂ reacted with 6 g of H₂ to produce 34 g of NH₃

Next, we shall determine the limiting reactant. This can be obtained as follow:

From the balanced equation above,

28 g of N₂ reacted with 6 g of H₂.

Therefore, 80 g of N₂ will react with = (80 × 6)/28 = 17.14 g of H₂.

We can see from the calculation made above that a higher mass (i.e 17.14 g) of H₂ than what was given (i.e 10 g) is required to react completely with 80 g of N₂. Thus, H₂ is the limiting reactant and N₂ is the excess reactant.

Finally, we shall determine the maximum mass of ammonia (NH₃) produced from the reaction.

To obtain the maximum mass of NH₃, the limiting reactant will be used because all of it is consumed in the reaction.

The limiting reactant is H₂ and the maximum mass of NH₃ can be obtained as follow:

From the balanced equation above,

6 g of H₂ reacted to produce 34 g of NH₃.

Therefore, 10 g of H₂ will react to produce = (10 × 34)/6 = 56.67 g of NH₃.

Therefore, 56.67 g of NH₃ is produced from the reaction.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

personal, she chose to do it.