Organisms are more likely to be preserved in mud because sand has gaps and can allow air or oxygen-containing water to flow through and around the fossils, decomposing them

Yes, the fossils are more likely to be preserved in mud as compared to the sand because the air in the sand decompose them.

Explanation:

The sand contains gaps in it which are filled by the air, these air tend to decompose the fossil. There are some criteria which enables that organisms to become fossil. One of those is that, the organism must not decompose or be eaten by other organism.

In order for the organism to become fossil it should be preserved in such an environment where it is buried in such as way it is not oxidized by oxygen or get decomposed by oxygen.

So, organism are more likely to be preserved in mud as there there are no or very less gaps containing oxygen.

passed in september 1935, these laws are known as nuremberg laws.   they forbid jews from marrying but not directly forced them to divorce aryans. what is most noticeable is the fact that the jews were defranchised, meaning by this that they were not expected to have any civil rights, including the right to vote. the right answer is deprived of the right to vote.

first let us lay out the formula for potential

and kinetic energy:

pe = mgh

ke = (mv^2)/2

where: m=mass, v=velocity, g=gravitational

acceleration, h=height

calculating for mass using the known values of

pe:

340j = m (9.81 m/s^2) (50ft) (1m/3.28ft)

m = 2.27 kg

the law of conservation of energy states that

energy is neither created nor destroyed. therefore, the change in kinetic

energy from 50 ft to 35 ft would be equal to the change in potential energy

from 50 ft to 35 ft. however it would be opposite in signs since one is losing

while other is gaining.

ke(35ft) – ke(50ft) = - [ pe(35ft) – pe(50ft]

ke(50ft) = 0 since the brick is initially at rest

ke(35ft) = 340j - 2.27kg (9.81 m/s^2) (35ft)

(1m/3.28 ft)

ke(35ft)

= 102.38 j