Chemistry, 18.01.2020 17:31 tomasgarrido10

Best gets
i need 3 pieces of evidence supporting that the distribution of the planets in our solar system is different than commonly thought.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Gee. I'll have to guess at what's "commonly thought".

One thing is the scale. Nobody has an accurate picture of the scale in
his head, because we never see a true-scale drawing. THAT's because
it's almost impossible to draw one on paper.

Example:
Shrink the solar system and everything in it so that the Sun
is the size of a quarter (the 25¢ coin).
Then:
-- The Earth is in orbit around the sun, 8.6 feet from it.
That's close enough that you might think you could find the
shrunken Earth. Unfortunately, it's only 0.009 inch in diameter.

-- The shrunken Jupiter is a 'huge' gas giant almost 0.1 inch in diameter.
It's orbiting the sun, about 45 feet away from it.

-- The shrunken Uranus is another gas giant, about 0.035 inch in diameter.
It's orbiting the sun, about 165 feet away from it.

-- The nearest star outside of the solar system is 441 MILES away !
On the same shrunken scale !
And there's NOTHING between here and there !

I think that's the biggest point to make about the REAL solar system ...
its utter emptiness. With the sun reduced to something you can hold
in your hand, the planets are the size of grains of sand, with hundreds
of feet of nothingness between them.

Same for its mass: The solar system is approximately nothing but a star.
That's it. A star, with some dust and some gas around it, and here and there
in the neighborhood a microscopic pebble or a chip of mineral. But mostly
it's nothing but a star ... if you went around and gathered up all that other
rubbish in the same bag and called it a part of the same solar system, the
sun would still have more than 99% of the total mass, and the bag would
hold less than 1% of it.

Book ... It's getting late, Hillary's fading, and that's all I can think of.
I hope this much is some help.

Answer from: Quest

explanation:

metals have excess of electrons whereas non-metals have deficiency of electrons. thus, in order to gain stability metals easily donate their electrons to the non-metals.

for example, electronic configuration of sodium is $1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{1}$ and electronic configuration of phosphorous is $1s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{2}3p^{3}$ .

when a phosphorous atom and sodium atom combine together then sodium will donate is extra one electron to the phosphorous atom. as a result there will be formation of ionic bond between sodium and phosphorous.

the reaction will be as follows.

$3na + p \rightarrow na_{3}p$

there, are three sodium sodium atoms and each of them will donate its one extra electron to phosphorous atom. thus, the sub-shell of phosphorous gets completely filled.

thus, we can conclude that electrons are transferred from atoms of sodium to atoms of phosphorous. this transfer makes the sodium atoms donate one electron and the phosphorous atoms to gain one electron. as a result, the sodium and phosphorus atoms strongly attract each other.

Electrons are transferred from atoms of to atoms of this transfer makes the sodium atoms and the

Answer from: Quest

it should have an internal chamber and two thermometers sticking out of the top. the internal chamber will also be closed off from the outside.

Another question on Chemistry

Chemistry, 21.06.2019 20:00

Smog is the term used to describe the combination of fog and smoke

Answers: 1

Answer

Chemistry, 21.06.2019 21:30

Put these processes of the water cycle in the correct order, starting at the point where the water is in the lake: 1. water evaporates into the atmosphere 2. rain, snow, or other precipitation falls 3. water collects into larger bodies of water 4. water vapor condenses into liquid water

Answers: 1

Answer

Chemistry, 21.06.2019 21:30

How air particles exert a pressure on the inside of the balloon

Answers: 1

Answer

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 04:30

Which statement best describes the relationship between period and frequency of light waves? a) in wave b the period increases and the frequency decreases from wave a. b) in wave a the period increases and the frequency decreases from wave b. c) in wave b the period is shorter and the frequency is greater than in wave a. d) in wave a the period is shorter and the frequency is greater than in wave b.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Best gets
i need 3 pieces of evidence supporting that the distribution of the planets in our s...

Questions