A chemical breaks down in a flow-balanced, steady-state CFMR according to first-order reaction kinetics. At steady state, the upstream and downstream concentration of the chemical are 15 mg/L and 5 g/m3. Water is being treated at a rate of 0.42 m3/sec. The volume of the tank is 500,000 liters. Assuming a first-order reaction, what is the rate constant

Explanation:

From the given information:

The initial concentration of a chemical

The final concentration is = 5 mg/L

Volume flow rate

Volume of the tank V = 500 000 L = 500 m³

The time t is determined by using the formula:

t = 1190.47 sec

t ≅ 19.8 min

∴

The rate of the decay constant is:

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.