Why is Darwin's theory of Evolution by Natural Selection not 'just a theory?*
A. It does not rely on dependent variables, only independent variables.
O B. A hypothesis does not a become a theory until it IS
already supported by evidence.
R
C. It iS just a theory, it is equivalent to a guess.
D. It
has more evidence than a hypothesis, but less than a law.

conduction is the transfer of thermal energy (heat in transfer) due to collisions between the molecules in the object. collisions between adjacent atoms and molecules transfer kinetic energy from the warmer to the cooler object. the objects must be in physical contact.

with this one i know the answer in craters one reason i looked it up and i learned about it there is my evidence

a chemical change results in a new substance being formed; whereas a physical change will result in a different state of matter

explanation: