Can someone tell me if my answer is correct. Does a hypothesis need to be correct for an experiment to be a success? Explain why or why not?

My A hypothesis does not need to be correct for a successful experiment because if you're able to reject or validate your hypothesis you learn something.

What is the relation between concentration of reactants and the rate of chemical reaction?

The table describes how some substances were formed substance 19 description formed by boiling pure water formed by combining three hydrogen atoms to every nitrogen atom formed by adding 5 g of sugar to 1 l of water formed by compressing carbon under high pressure based on the given descriptions, which substance is most likely a mixture?

Which statement names the physical property of wood a. wood is softer than coal b. wood does not rust c. wood can rot d. wood can burn