This is a two part question: In what type of argumentation situation do you think you might find Rogerian argument more productive than traditional argument? Describe an issue, along with the rhetorical situation, that might prompt you to resort to Rogerian argument

In what type of argumentation situation do you think you might find traditional argument more productive than traditional argument? Describe an issue, along with the rhetorical situation, that might prompt you to resort to Rogerian argument

If a plot weight (in g) vs. volume (in ml) for a metal gave the equation y= 13.41x and r^2=0.9981 what is the density of the metal?

If i can still dissolve more sugar into the solution at a certain temperature what would i call that solution

Achemist wants to extract copper metal from copper chloride solution. the chemist places 0.50 grams of aluminum foil in a solution containing 0.75 grams of copper (ii) chloride. a single replacement reaction takes place. (ii) chloride. a single replacement reaction takes place. which statement explains the maximum amount of copper that the chemist can extract using this reaction? a) approximately 0.36 grams, because copper (ii) chloride acts as a limiting reactant b) approximately 1.8 grams, because copper (ii) chloride acts as a limiting reactant c) approximately 0.36 grams, because aluminum acts as a limiting reactant d) approximately 1.8 grams, because aluminum acts as a limiting reactant