Nthe video, mcwhorter says that “textspeak” might be a good thing for young people’s brains. why does he think this?

Consider the following code snippet: #ifndef cashregister_h#define cashregister_hconst double max_balance = 6000000.0; class cashregister{public: cashregister(); cashregister(double new_balance); void set_balance(double new_balance); double get_balance() const; private: double balance[12]; }; double get_monthly_balance(cashregister bk, int month); #endifwhich of the following is correct? a)the header file is correct as given.b)the definition of max_balance should be removed since header files should not contain constants.c)the definition of cashregister should be removed since header files should not contain class definitions.d)the body of the get_monthly_balance function should be added to the header file.

(, urgent need): how do i change my username

The idea that, for each pair of devices v and w, there’s a strict dichotomy between being “in range” or “out of range” is a simplified abstraction. more accurately, there’s a power decay function f (·) that specifies, for a pair of devices at distance δ, the signal strength f(δ) that they’ll be able to achieve on their wireless connection. (we’ll assume that f (δ) decreases with increasing δ.) we might want to build this into our notion of back-up sets as follows: among the k devices in the back-up set of v, there should be at least one that can be reached with very high signal strength, at least one other that can be reached with moderately high signal strength, and so forth. more concretely, we have values p1 ≥ p2 ≥ . . ≥ pk, so that if the back-up set for v consists of devices at distances d1≤d2≤≤dk,thenweshouldhavef(dj)≥pj foreachj. give an algorithm that determines whether it is possible to choose a back-up set for each device subject to this more detailed condition, still requiring that no device should appear in the back-up set of more than b other devices. again, the algorithm should output the back-up sets themselves, provided they can be found.\