This question is from " Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World" textbook in chapter 6 Say whether the following claim is true or false, and provide a brief (1-3 sentence) explanation for your answer. Claim: If player A in a two-person game has a dominant strategy sA, then there is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium in which player A plays sA and player B plays a best response to sA.

Show that there is a language a ⚆ {0, 1} â— with the following properties: 1. for all x â a, |x| ≤ 5. 2. no dfa with fewer than 9 states recognizes a. hint: you don’t have to define a explicitly; just show that it has to exist. count the number of languages satisfying (1) and the number of dfas satisfying (2), and argue that there aren’t enough dfas to recognize all those languages. to count the number of languages satisfying (1), think about writing down all the strings of length at most 5, and then to define such a language, you have to make a binary decision for each string about whether to include it in the language or not. how many ways are there to make these choices? to count the number of dfas satisfying (2), consider that a dfa behaves identically even if you rename all the states, so you can assume without loss of generality that any dfa with k states has the state set {q1, q2, . . , qk}. now think about how to count how many ways there are to choose the other four parts of the dfa.

Click on this link toopens a new window. bring up a flowchart in a new browser window. based on this flowchart, would a d-link 3347 gateway with an xbox 360 multiplayer problem be in scope or out of scope

Idon understand these and need some ! ?