2 paragraphs of shooting games doesn’t make you violent

Video games. A common pastime for the American people, children and adults alike. However, one thing many people confuse about video games is the false notion that violent ones carry over into real life behavior. For example, are you a culinary chef after you play Overcooked? Are you a professional soccer player after playing FIFA? If the answers to those are no, or something of the sort, then shooter games should not be tied to school shootings and things of the such.

For one, shooter games are not realistic scenarios that children and adults will be played in. As for Counter Strike, players can play as police men and defend the people from terrorists who attack them, which is a positive message to send out. Another example would be Doom Eternal, which is a game about fighting demons, which at the end of the day is quite a religious and healthy message to spread to children. Even for more realistic shooter games, children are not likely to find a gun laying around, and by the chance that they do and they know how to use it, their judgment is greater than their anger at that age if they are knowledgeable in how to use a gun.

In conclusion, shooter games do not make people violent. The notion that they do is absurd, as it is, as parents say "not real", and therefore shouldn't have so much time invested in it. But, if a child is doing good in school and well behaved, there is no problem with letting them play shooter games. If anything, they build experiences with friends when they play with them. Isn't that what childhood is about, playing with friends? Adults are typically good with judgment in these sorts of things, and they should know better. For adulthood is full of freedom, and they should be able to do what they need to enjoy it.

Explanation:

answer; middle level managers;

the answer is d. splog