Anti-lock braking systems can a. impede your braking stability. b. improve your braking stability. c. improve your breaking power. d. impede you're braking power.

1)consider the following code snippet: #ifndef book_h#define book_hconst double max_cost = 1000.0; class book{public: book(); book(double new_cost); void set_cost(double new_cost); double get_cost() const; private: double cost; }; double calculate_terms(book bk); #endifwhich of the following is correct? a)the header file is correct as given.b)the definition of max_cost should be removed since header files should not contain constants.c)the definition of book should be removed since header files should not contain class definitions.d)the body of the calculate_terms function should be added to the header file.

What is the most important for you to choose before you build a network?

The idea that, for each pair of devices v and w, there’s a strict dichotomy between being “in range” or “out of range” is a simplified abstraction. more accurately, there’s a power decay function f (·) that specifies, for a pair of devices at distance δ, the signal strength f(δ) that they’ll be able to achieve on their wireless connection. (we’ll assume that f (δ) decreases with increasing δ.) we might want to build this into our notion of back-up sets as follows: among the k devices in the back-up set of v, there should be at least one that can be reached with very high signal strength, at least one other that can be reached with moderately high signal strength, and so forth. more concretely, we have values p1 ≥ p2 ≥ . . ≥ pk, so that if the back-up set for v consists of devices at distances d1≤d2≤≤dk,thenweshouldhavef(dj)≥pj foreachj. give an algorithm that determines whether it is possible to choose a back-up set for each device subject to this more detailed condition, still requiring that no device should appear in the back-up set of more than b other devices. again, the algorithm should output the back-up sets themselves, provided they can be found.\