For each of the following languages, give a recursive description of the language. Your basis step must explicitly enumerate a finite number of initial elements. Try to use the shortest description possible (in terms of the number of recursive rules and the number of basis rules). Briefly (1-2 sentences) justify that your description defines the same language but do not give us a full proof; (a) Binary strings that start with 0 and have odd length (i. e. an odd number of characters)
(b) Binary strings r such that len(x) = 1 (mod 3) where len() is the number of characters in r.
(c) Binary strings with an odd number of Os.

The answer should be menu

The correct answer is d

One main difference is that a graphing calculator can graph out functions while a scientific calculator cannot. there are some scientific calculations that have built-in table functions, but generally (and obviously) scientific calculators are not built to be able to graph. graphing calculators have larger screens to accommodate for their eponymous use.furthermore, graphing calculators are usually more advanced. because of the specifications needed (like ram, processor) to be able to generate graphics, graphing calculators are able to support more sophisticated functions/features. some graphing calculators have a computer-algebra system, like the ti-89 titanium. some support spreadsheets. some even support programmable games. some allow for connectivity with a computer to install new programs.we have to consider another major difference: the price. graphing calculations are way more expensive than scientific calculators. i believe this has to do with the history behind graphing calculators. for example, texas instruments basically holds a monolopy over graphing calculators. school keep using tis because that is what they are familiar with.