English, 20.07.2019 23:30 VampireQueen01

The writing process is a collection of strategies unique to each individual writer. writers continually evolve and adjust their strategies as they become more experienced. when you finish a writing assignment, how do you grow as a writer? part of bettering your own writing is applying the feedback you receive from past assignments. one way to do that is through peer review. peer reviews can offer a fresh lens on areas that need improvement. using a previous writing example, explain how the feedback you received was in improving your writing. explain ways in which future peer reviews would be . what advice would you give to students who take this course in the future who haven’t experienced a peer review of their writing?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

You can grow as a writer after finishing a writing assignment, not only because of the knowledge you gained when writing the essay, but also by looking at and implementing corrections. You may see grammar mistakes, organizational issues, or citation errors more clearly, especially if a professor or peer has pointed them out for you.

After finding a previous writing example that has feedback on it, you can explain that the feedback was helpful by catching errors you didn't see, by helping you brainstorm ideas to expand your essay, or by helping you re-word phrases that were unclear to an outside reader.

You can explain that future peer reviews would be helpful because you would be receiving multiple perspectives on your piece, and you would be able to have a discussion about your piece that could lead to new ideas and/or refinement of your previous ideas.

You can advise future students that peer reviews may seem daunting at first, but they are less scary with practice and are beneficial for your paper. You should also advise them that when giving peer reviews, the feedback should be honest, constructive, and professional.

Answer from: Quest

i need with the same thing

Answer from: Quest

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use propaganda to achieve thir goals, the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 17:00

What is the difference between a major and a minor character? a major character has a less important story line, while a minor character plays a bigger role in the plot. a major character plays a big role in the plot, while a minor character has a less important story line. a major character has an unimportant story line in the plot. a minor character's story line is as important and developed as the major characters' story lines.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 20:00

Is "they" an unstressed or stressed syllable?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:50

What does the line most likely show about the setting of the scene?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:00

Based on this excerpt, charlotte smith and reverend walsh