Amajor difference between reporters and editorial writers is that editorial writers must be able to a) compare and contrast differing sets of ideas and personalities. b) distinguish between fact and opinion. c) recognize the contextual information required for a piece of writing. d) use arguments to promote a point of view.

I don't know if this is correct but I would choose B) distinguish between fact and opinion. The reason is because an editorial writer is supposed to make sure everything is fact and accurate, and they are supposed to record information faithfully. On the other hand, reporters tend to twist peoples words and make events seem bigger than what really happened.

Afriendly this is wrong but i had to answer a question so