Research the issue of genetically modified foods, and then write an essay to be read by your peers in which you argue either for or against their use. support your position with evidence.

although now people in general debates about the role of gm foods in society; feeding humanity would not be efficiently possible as it is in modern times without "selective breeding" aka "artificial selection", which is the use of genetic engineering to produce gmos.

such approach result hypocritical to certain extent because generally, the same uninformed and illiterate people, tend to accept the use of genetic engineering in medical applications and give them a free pass, but the same thing is treated differently when it comes to agriculture, which makes no rational sense, since humans have been using genetic modification on plants and animals for thousands of years already, especially to enhance the benefits of a particular species, and because everything humans eat now, has been genetically modified in some manner to get to the point it is today; so people is probably just fearful of the term gmos and this doesn't much in the discussion regarding sustainable agriculture.

what of the following? i don't know about you but i see no multiple choice answers.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)