Li wrote a speech about freedom that included visuals of maps and timelines, and jackie wrote a speech about freedom that included the repetition of words and phrases. based on this scenario, which speech is more effective? li's speech is more effective because it is about freedom. jackie's speech is more effective because it repeats words and phrases. li's speech is more effective because it uses visuals of maps and timelines. jackie's speech is more effective because it is about freedom.

Jackie's speech is more effective because it repeats words and phrases.

Explanation:

The speech which includes visuals of maps and timelines is more effective to any other topic than this one. The listeners who can hear both speeches are in a position to pick up the better. Even the speech is full of visuals of maps and timelines, there must be something more to lease someone's attention.

The speech could be effective, substantial and one who is talking must pay attention to concept his speech as concise speech so listeners could pay attention to.

Jackie used in a speech about the freedom filled with phrases and repetition of words to emphasize some points about the topic. He uses familiar words so the listeners can remember and establish their knowledge of freedom. The phrases can be impressible due to familiar and how are used in speech. Jackie's speech about freedom can be a spark for listeners to remember and establish knowledge about this topic.

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.

well if you have a lion for example it will kill you and that's why you shouldn't have and exotic animal