subject
English, 30.01.2020 15:47 natannale

Abig year
by bob kowalski

would you go to the ends of the earth to see a bird? what if it were a really special bird: one with beautiful feathers, an entrancing call, or a silly dance? what if seeing that one special bird would allow you to win a contest?

if that contest doesn't get you on television or win you any cash prizes, would you still do it? for those who participate in the "big year," the honor of beating the previous record is the only reward they get or even want.

a "big year" is a year in which a person attempts to see as many different species of birds as possible within a particular region. for most in north america who participate in a "big year," this region is the lower 48 american states, plus alaska, canada, and a couple of french islands off the canadian coast.

you may be thinking that looking at birds is silly, but just think about the numbers of the recent record holders and the commitment it takes to get these numbers. one recent "big year" winner managed to see 744 birds in one year, missing the record by just one bird. big year birders travel by train, plane, boat, car, bicycle, and of course, by foot. they can cover over 150 thousand miles to get numbers of sightings this high. they can also spend a small fortune.

just to clarify, the birds these contestants are counting are the number that they see in a particular year. you see, the contest is based on an honor system. no pictures or other evidence is required as proof of a sighting. most birders take great pride in their reputation and their abilities to see or hear and then identify a bird. usually, important sightings of the rare birds needed to get counts in the 700s are visited by hundreds of birders. it is pretty hard to cheat your way to a record-breaking year, but in general, few are interested in cheating.

this honesty comes from the fact that most people who want to break such a record know the greatest rewards are not necessarily in winning. such rewards are in being able to commit a year of your life to doing something you love. rewards are found in seeing amazing, inspiring creatures like the california condor or the magnificent frigate bird. rewards also come in spending time with people who, like you, want to spend their time looking to the skies and trees for glimpses of emerald, crimson, or cerulean blue feathered jewels.

you don't have to be able to travel a continent to have a big birding experience though. have a big month. or a big weekend. set a personal record, learn to identify the species that live in your part of the world, or try to learn the calls of just two species of birds. you will soon find looking at birds isn't such a strange way to spend your time.

extra! extra! backyard birding
many schools, families, and young birders across the country participate in the "great backyard bird count." while not as long as a "big year," the "great backyard bird count" happens every year. it depends on birders and families across the country to watch feeders and other areas in their yards and count the number of birds they see. unlike the "big year," the goal is not to see who can count the most birds. instead, participants in this event work together to bird experts get a good idea of how birds are doing. participants are given checklists and enter their sightings on a website. called a "citizen-science" project, this event is open to anyone, requires no travel, and happens every year over one weekend in february.

read these sentences:

would you go to the ends of the earth to see a bird? what if it were a really special bird: one with beautiful feathers, an entrancing call, or a silly dance?

what synonym could replace entrancing?
pretty
musical
loud
fascinating


Abig year by bob kowalski would you go to the ends of the earth to see a bird? wh

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:10
How can miscommunication cause a tragedy?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:00
How do sotomayor’s descriptions of her family most likely affect readers? they show readers how latina families decorate their homes. they give readers images of the importance of family. they describe the struggle sotomayor endured in becoming a judge. they give readers feelings of hopelessness and desperation.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:30
At least 10 sentences. topic: pranks have you ever pranked a friend? have you ever been pranked? do you like pranks? can pranks go too far?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Abig year
by bob kowalski

would you go to the ends of the earth to see a bird? wh...
Questions
question
History, 08.04.2020 05:52
question
Mathematics, 08.04.2020 05:52
Questions on the website: 13722361