94 pts someone write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas. has to be 500 words .

Here it is:

Personally, I think that using controlled fires to protect wild areas is a bad idea. First of all, I don't think there is a thing as a raging, huge CONTROLLED fire. Just one slip up something could go wrong. I don't think it's worth it. There are other ways to protect wild areas, and burning it down is not one of them. Secondly, it releases a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not good for the atmosphere. We want breathable air, not smoke and carbon dioxide. Lastly, you could kill a lot of wildlife. Burning down the area to save the area will not help. I do not think it is worth it.

Best of luck,

elon musk, ceo of spacex, a startup space company is planning to head to mars by 2023. nasa is planning to go to mars at around 2025. both are just for a basic colony.

i think they are preparing for the battle of gaul. : )

i hope this you! : )