Determine whether the textual evidence supports an analysis that “character is who you are in the dark” applies to “the most dangerous game” and “lather and nothing else.” alone in the jungle, rainsford is afraid. -supports -does not support rainsford is a well-known hunter. -supports -does not support the barber is skilled at his job. -supports -does not support the barber has been secretly the rebels. -supports -does not support

supports

does not support

does not support

supports

"Alone in the jungle, Rainsford is afraid."

Supports

Explanation: In the beginning of the story, Rainsford is portrayed as a fearless hunter, but when he is alone in the jungle, he is the complete opposite.

"Rainsford is a well-known hunter."

Does not support

Explanation: Being a "well-known hunter" is Rainsford's reputation, not the character he portrays in secret.

"The barber is skilled at his job."

Does not support

Explanation: The statement regarding the barber's expertise is something everyone is aware of, it does not refer to what he does in secret.

"The barber has been secretly helping the rebels."

Supports

Explanation: The fact that he is secretly helping the rebels is who he secretly is. Being a barber is only a secondary trait, or a cover up for what is truly important.

the correct answer is a "it describes nora and mrs. linde's relationship". opcions b and d are not related to the content of the passage in any way. option c could be appropiate but it does not fully capture the effect of the dialogue, while option a is quite appropiate, since the dialogue not only exemplifies the relationship between the characters, but it also captures the effect in the excerpt. we get to know that mrs linde bosses around and already knows nora.

sugar had three primary uses in ancient india. it was used in religious rituals, consumed as a snack, and considered a type of medicine.