What is a logical strategy for refuting counterclaims? using evidence using informal language using fallacious reasoning using emotions

A logical strategy for refuting counterclaims is using evidence.

In formal writing, it is important to refute counterclaims, which means to disprove the opposing argument(s) to your argumentative thesis. If you use informal language, this will not allow for flow and reasoning in your paper. Using fallacious reasoning would not be a positive way to refute counterclaims, because you want your paper to be filled with reputable facts and correct information. Finally, using emotions is frowned upon in formal and argumentative writing because your arguments or rebuttals should be based only on facts and logical evidence. To refute counterclaims, the best answer is thus to use evidence because this will support your rebuttal of the counterclaim and make any readers believe your claim.

Hope this helps!

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

d becuase khgfdwhat effect does the word head have on the meaning of this passage?

a. it demonstrates how intelligent he was.

b. it shows he was a favorite of the teachers.

c. it indicates he would be a good preacher.

d. it reveals how self-important he was.

how does the choice of the word head contribute to the passage’s tone?

a. it offers a sense of entitlement.