99 pts to the person who answers this honestly i’ll tell you in a word what i’m about: i preach for money, and for nothing else. and so my text is what it always was: radix malorum est cupiditas. thus i know how to preach against the vice which masters me—and that is avarice. –the canterbury tales, geoffrey chaucer how is the pardoner characterized in this passage? the pardoner is grumpy and judgmental. the pardoner is studious and creative. the pardoner is friendly and thoughtful. the pardoner is dishonest and hypocritical.

According to what you've said, we can conclude the Pardoner is dishonest and hypocritical since this is what his arguments and thinking express.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101

the answer is

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.