Match the definition to the term. 1. a verb form ending in -ing used as an adjective verb phrase 2. a verb form used as another part of speech restrictive clause 3. a verb form ending in -ing used as a noun participle 4. group of words without a subject or verb used as single part of speech coordinating conjunction 5. verb form preceded by to, used as a noun, an adjective, or an adverb gerund phrase 6. phrase beginning with a preposition prepositional phrase 7. prepositional phrase modifying a noun or pronoun adjective phrase 8. participle with complements and modifiers phrase 9. verb ending in -ing used with a verb gerund 10. prepositional phrase modifying a verb, adjective, or adverb infinitive 11. a conjunction that joins words or groups of words of equal rank. participial phrase 12. an adjective clause that is essential to the meaning of the sentence. adverb phrase 13. a verbal form ending in -ing with its object and modifiers used as a noun. verbal

Which sentence is punctuated correctly? a. my dad loves to cook, however; he hates to do dishes. b. my dad loves to cook; however, he hates to do dishes. c. my dad loves to cook however, he hates to do dishes.

Read the excerpt from "a modest proposal." the poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own, which by law may be made liable to a distress, and to pay their landlord's rent, their corn and cattle being already seized, and money a thing unknown. which statement effectively uses a quotation to show that swift claims that the poor will also benefit from his proposal? “swift writes that poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own, which by law may be made liable to a distress.” swift writes that poorer tenants will finally have something to pay their landlord’s rent since they have neither money nor trade. swift writes that poorer tenants will have something to trade for rent since “their corn and cattle” have already been seized. swift writes that “poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own” that can “ to pay their landlord’s rent.”

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.