Do you agree with the auteur theory? why or why not?

The "auteur theory" is a way of looking at films that focuses on the director as the "author" of the film. If we agree with this theory, then we most likely think that a film is a reflection of the director, and that certain directors will give a film a particular tone and feeling that we can associate with them.

I agree with this theory only in a few cases. I believe there are directors who have a consistent vision of what they want to express, and the aesthetics, as well as the story that they develop in each film is equally consistent. Some examples would be Quentin Tarantino, Alfred Hitchcock, Tim Burton, Wes Anderson and Sofia Coppola. However, in most cases, the identity of the author is not as clear, and the movie's 'feel' is instead achieved through the collective effort of a large and diverse team of people.

- "about the claims : -

making a claim is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.' claims are not just opinions. a claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on your knowledge .

about the country claims : -

a counterclaim is just the opposite of a claim. counterclaims are also provable and supportable by reasons and evidence. not just, 'because i said so.' when you're planning an argument, you need to know what the counterclaim might be so that you can make sure that you disprove it with your reasons and evidence your research." - (catherineroberts)