Based on what you have learned about racial segregation and the arguements of george wallace and dr. martin luther king jr, explain why you think fr. kings arguements proved to be more effective than george wallace's

George Wallace was a far-right American politician and 45th Governor of Alabama. He sought the U. S. presidency three times, unsuccessfully. He is best remembered for his segregationist and right-wing views, which placed him in stark opposition to Martin Luther King Jr.

One of the reasons why Wallace was able to gain so much support in Alabama was because of the large numbers of disenfranchised Black Americans and poor whites in his state. This was reversed by the federal civil rights legislation of 1964 and 1965, which greatly decreased his influence. Another reason why his influence declined was because he changed his views later on in his career. In the late 1970s, Wallace announced he was a born-again Christian and apologized for his actions against civil rights leaders. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. was fighting for civil rights at a time when the youth of the U. S. was a large political force and was driven by pacifist goals of equality. King was able to ride on this movement and contribute to it significantly.

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people

hello.  

answer ir: bush stirs up emotions of brotherhood and freedom to inspire americans.

however, you could u provide the whole options so as to verify : )

hope it .