Which two claims in this excerpt from franklin d roosevelt’s four freedom speech given in 1941 can be considered inconsistent with us policy?

The discourse of Franklin D. Roosevelt of 1941 in the United States Congress had as fundamental pillars the establishment of the four liberties. These were:

1. Freedom of speech: all the communities and individuals have the freedom to express their ideas and opinions without fear of censorship or sanction.

2. Freedom to worship God in his own way

3. Freedom from want: standard of living guaranteeing an income to fulfill basic needs.

4. Freedom for fear: reduction of armaments to avoid physical aggressions

The politics of the United States can be seen as an antithesis of these last two pillars, since for example the freedom from want has been replaced by the selfishness of capitalism that does not ensure a minimum vital and on the contrary promotes social inequality . On the other hand, freedom for fear can be seen ignored in the case of Cuba and the economic blockade carried out by the United States, who constantly press for the socialist government not to prosper and additionally, it is the country with the highest military spending in the world.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

i need with the same thing