Read the claim from anna north's editorial "why bob dylan shouldn’t have gotten a nobel." bob dylan does not deserve the nobel prize in literature. which sentence from the article offers a logical reason that supports the claim? "he is a wonderful musician, a world-class songwriter and an enormously influential figure in american culture." "when the nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer." "by honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation." "bob dylan does not need a nobel prize in literature, but literature needs a nobel prize." answer is b

The correct answer would be option B: "When the Nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer". This is a logical reason, since it is true, that only one nobel prize can go to a person each year, and by giving it to Bob Dylan, a writer was left out. Option A is incorrect because it is not a logical reason, it is a compliment. Option C is incorrect because it is an inference as to why they gave the award to Bob Dylan. Option D is incorrect because it is just a statement.

Thank you very much

themselves

an intensive pronoun is a pronoun that ends in self or selves, such as himself, herself, themselves, yourself, ourselves. since band members is a third person plural, the correct intensive pronoun would be themselves. if the band was talked about as a collective noun, itself would be the appropriate intensive pronoun. intensive pronouns are used to add emphasis to the noun it's modifying which is why it directly follows it.

jgdwfvjhteqsvbyg huye bhg