In the section “facts v. interpretation,” how does mr. kurland compare non-critical readers with critical readers? (site 1)

The answer is: Mr. Kurland bases his fundamental and comparison of both different kinds of readers mentioned, in the analysis.

Kurland compares the critical reader to the non-critical reader based on the analysis of the read text. While the non-critical reader is not concerned with whether that text is only a version of what is true, the critical reader performs this analysis. The non-critical reader is concerned with understanding the idea of the text, it does not bother to analyze. The non-critical reader reads the text with no concerns about information, language usage or values. This is linear reading activity. The critical reader performs a diferent readig activity, which is analytic.

what does the teacher mean

i’m writing a memoir and i’ve been given the great suggestion of placing a ‘sub-narrative’ within some of the chapters – sort of, what was going on with me in the grand scheme of things.

i was wondering how to format this so that it is very obvious we are stepping out the of story.

firstly is a change in font from serif to sans workable? i also use dashes for a scene change. was thinking of using a different scene-changer too.

here’s a (shortened) example:

university – or what’s known as ‘uni’ in australia – were some of the best days of my life. where else do you get to potter around in a great location, have very little responsibility, learn lots of things, do lots of things and walk out four years later with a bonus – a degree!

with my university years i had immersed myself into community of intelligent ambitious people. generally everyone had a confidence about themselves. they knew where they were going in life and weren’t threatened by others.

—–

next normal paragraph continues here…

(sorry couldn’t show the fonts in this comment field)

too much?