Hannah is writing an argument about free speech on the internet. read her claim. the danger is that protection will turn into censorship, eroding our constitutional right to freedom of speech. what reasons can hannah use to support her claim? select two options. a)the internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear. internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content. b)social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them. c)by refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators. d)it is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

A)The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.

D)It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

These both support Hannah's claim about allowing free speech on the internet so that protection does not turn into censorship. Option A supports the idea that the internet is a place where people can speak their minds. Option D explains why giving people the task of judging online content is problematic. The other two options are in favor of allowing certain safeguards that would limit free speech on the internet. These are counterclaims that Hannah needs to address in her argument but to show why they are weak not as support for her claim.

The answer choices are wrong

Explanation:

a)The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.

b)Internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content.

c)Social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them.

d)By refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators.

e)It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

the use supports it by making it seem like the dictators are not bad to the people when the truly are.