What argument did andrew jackson use to persuade people that the indian removal act was a good decision? a. american indians are afraid of the white settlers and are begging for their own land b. white settlers will be safer once american indians have been moved to a different location c. what is settlers are more important american indians and deserve more land d. american indians have become too wealthy and are not as hospitable as they were before

The answer is white settlers will be safer once American Indians have been moved to a different location. I hope this helps! :)

The correct answer is B. White settlers will be safer once American Indians have been removed to a different location

Explanation:

The objective of this policy was to remove Native American tribes to territories West of the Mississippi River, so their ancestral lands could be occupied by White settlers. Arguments supporting the Act included that they were still savages that could not be assimilated into the White system. In order to avoid the raids against White settlers, "Indians" had to be relocated. This controversial meassure led to the Trail of Tears and contributed to the genocide of indigenous peoples in America.

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.