Dis wrong read the excerpt from a credible source for mirai’s research-based essay on the effects of the declining bee population. honeybees play a major role in the pollination of produce sold in the united states. without the prolific support of honeybees, the nation’s agricultural economy will suffer losses as great as those in the bee population. what would be the most effective way for mirai to include this research in her essay? a) she should quote the first sentence directly, because it contains specific information that would be difficult to restate. b) she should summarize the first sentence, because it describes the central argument of the essay in straightforward language. c) she should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way. d) she should paraphrase the second sentence, because it presents basic knowledge that does not need to be cited.

The answer is C. The second sentence directly states why Honey Bees are beneficial, and gives specific reasoning.  **Edit: the first sentence fails to answer the prompt “the effects of declining bee population” and could easily be restated, while the second sentence directly states the results.

C) She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way.

Explanation: When writing a essay is very important to include the information of credible and reliable sources, in order to make our argument more valid. In this case, Mirai is writing an essay on the effects of the declining bee population, from the reliable source that she found, she should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way (it supports the idea of the negative consequences of the lack of honeybees in the agricultural economy and bee population).

this is an ad? the hell is your audience bro xd

explanation: